VSports app下载 - Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer Immunol Res. 2019 Mar 19;7(5):759–772. doi: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-18-0466

"VSports手机版" IL15 enhances CAR-T-cell antitumor activity by reducing mTORC1 activity and preserving their stem cell memory phenotype

Darya Alizadeh 1, V体育平台登录 - Robyn A Wong 1, Xin Yang 1, Dongrui Wang (V体育官网) 1,2, Joseph R Pecoraro 1, Cheng-Fu Kuo 1,2, Brenda Aguilar 1, Yue Qi 3, "VSports手机版" David K Ann 2,3, VSports - Renate Starr 1, Ryan Urak 2, Xiuli Wang 1, Stephen J Forman 1,#, Christine E Brown 1,#,*
PMCID: PMC6687561  NIHMSID: NIHMS1524450  PMID: 30890531

Abstract

Improvements in the quality and fitness of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-engineered T cells, through CAR design or manufacturing optimizations, could enhance the therapeutic potential of CAR-T cells. One parameter influencing the effectiveness of CAR-T cell therapy is the differentiation status of the final product: CAR-T cells that are less differentiated and less exhausted are more therapeutically effective. In the current study, we demonstrate that CAR-T cells expanded in IL15 (CAR-T/IL15) preserve a less-differentiated stem cell memory (Tscm) phenotype, defined by expression of CD62L+CD45RA+ CCR7+, as compared to cells cultured in IL2 (CAR-T/IL2). CAR-T/IL15 cells exhibited reduced expression of exhaustion markers, higher anti-apoptotic properties, and increased proliferative capacity upon antigen challenge VSports最新版本. Furthermore, CAR-T/IL15 cells exhibited decreased mTORC1 activity, reduced expression of glycolytic enzymes and improved mitochondrial fitness. CAR-T/IL2 cells cultured in rapamycin (mTORC1 inhibitor) shared phenotypic features with CAR-T/IL15 cells, suggesting that IL15-mediated reduction of mTORC1 activity is responsible for preserving the Tscm phenotype. CAR-T/IL15 cells promoted superior antitumor responses in vivo in comparison to CAR-T/IL2 cells. Inclusion of cytokines IL7 and/or IL21 in addition to IL15 reduced the beneficial effects of IL15 on CAR-T phenotype and antitumor potency. Our findings show that IL15 preserves the CAR-T cell Tscm phenotype and improves their metabolic fitness, which results in superior in vivo antitumor activity, thus opening an avenue that may improve future adoptive T cell therapies.

Keywords: CAR-T cells, CD19, IL13Ra2, IL15, mTORC, metabolism, exhaustion, antitumor

"VSports注册入口" Introduction:

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy is a promising therapeutic approach that delivers antitumor responses in some patients, especially in the setting of hematological malignancies. However, not all patients respond, and durability of the therapy can be limited. Ongoing efforts aim to enhance the antitumor potential of the CAR-T cells, especially for more challenging therapeutic settings such as solid tumors. Several parameters can impact the potency of the CAR-T cell product, including the use of specific T cell subsets (CD8+or CD4+ T cells, central memory T cells, or bulk peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs)), the type of costimulatory molecules integrated in the CAR construct, and the ex vivo culture conditions (1–5) VSports注册入口. CAR-T cells are usually generated from PBMCs and expanded ex vivo using IL2 (6). However, T cell products obtained using these procedures are phenotypically heterogeneous, and may largely be composed of antigen-experienced, highly differentiated T cell subsets such as effector-memory (Tem) and effector (Teff) T cells (7). Starting with less-differentiated T cells such as naïve (Tn), stem cell memory (Tscm) and central memory (Tcm) T cells for CAR-engineering results in a more potent antitumor immune responses than Tem and Teff engineered CAR products(8–11). However, although less-differentiated cells may be more beneficial, ex vivo culture methods (cytokine composition and culture duration) often promote T cell differentiation.

The γc-cytokine IL2, as a T cell growth factor, remains the most common cytokine used for expansion of therapeutic T cell products being administered to patients (6). However, repetitive stimulation of T cells with IL2 during ex vivo expansion can result in T cell exhaustion and reduced T cell persistence (10) V体育官网入口. The inclusion of other γc-cytokines, such as IL7 and IL15, has shown some benefit during ex vivo expansion of T cells (2). Indeed, this class of cytokines has broad effects on lymphocyte development, differentiation and their homeostasis (12). Some studies have shown that use of IL7 and IL15 together may preserve the Tscm phenotype and enhance the potency of CAR-T cells (2,13). Others have reported that IL21 promotes expansion of CD27+CD28+ CD8+ T cells (14) and enhances potency of CD19-CAR-T cells (15), as compared to other cytokines such as IL2. Despite these observations, the mechanisms by which these cytokines enhance T cell potency remain poorly understood.

Cellular metabolism regulates T cell differentiation as well as the retention of memory characteristics (16) VSports在线直播. Metabolic profiling and functional analyses have indicated that terminally differentiated Teff cells are characterized by high glycolytic activity whereas less-differentiated cells primarily rely on fatty acid oxidation (FAO) for energy production (17). Skewing cellular metabolism towards FAO by overexpressing carnitine palmitoyltransferase 1a (Cpt1a, an enzyme in FAO) or by inhibiting glycolysis in T cells increases the number of memory CD8+ T cells (16). Glycolysis and glucose transport is regulated by mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) activity (18). In this context, studies have indicated that the inhibition of the mTOR pathway using rapamycin results in the generation of CD8+ memory T cells (19–21). Thus, targeting pathways controlling T cell metabolism represents an attractive strategy to control the differentiation status of these cells.

With the goal of preserving T cells with stem-like phenotype during ex vivo expansion and to prevent terminal differentiation and activation-induced cell death, we compared cytokine conditions of our standard manufacturing platform (IL2/IL15low) to the use of IL15 alone. In this study, we demonstrate that ex vivo culture of CAR-T cell products in IL15 (CAR-T/IL15) was superior for maintaining the Tscm phenotype. Upon tumor challenge, CAR-T/IL15 cells showed fewer apoptotic features, higher proliferative capacity, and superior antitumor activity in vivo. Exposure to IL15 resulted in reduced activity of mTORC1, a regulator of glycolysis V体育2025版. IL15-mediated reduction of mTORC1 activity plays a role in preventing T cell differentiation as CAR-T/IL2 treated with rapamycin exhibit phenotypic characteristics similar to CAR-T/IL15 cells. Further assessment of metabolic function confirmed that CAR-T/IL15 cells exhibit greater mitochondria oxygen consumption rate (OCR) and spare respiratory capacity (SRC), which confers a metabolic advantage for survival and recall upon antigen challenge. These phenotypic characteristics was observed in both CD28-CAR- and 4–1BB-CAR-T cells. Together these findings reveal that IL15 reduces mTORC1 activity and improves potency of CAR-T cells.

Materials and Methods:

VSports在线直播 - Tumor cell lines

Raji-ffluc (CD19+; a kind gift from Dr. Michael Jensen in 2014), LCL (CD19+; generated by Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) transformation of human B cells as described previously (8), KG1A (CD19–;a kind gift from Dr. Ravi Bhatia in 2008) and human glioma cell line PBT030–2-ffLuc (IL13Rα2+; low passage tumor sphere line derived from human GBM tissue) were maintained as previously described (22). Cell banks of tumor lines were authenticated for the desired antigen/marker expression by flow cytometry and tested for mycoplasma VSports. Thawed cells from banks were maintained in culture for less than 1–3 months.

T cell isolation, lentiviral transduction and ex vivo CAR-T cell expansion

Blood products were obtained from healthy donors or discard kits with informed written consent (whenever necessary) after protocols were approved by the City of Hope (COH) Internal Review Board (IRB). All studies were conducted in accordance with U. S. Common Rule ethical guidelines. The peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were isolated by density gradient centrifugation over Ficoll-Paque (GE Healthcare) and then underwent CD14 depletion (PBMC population). For the CD62L+ population, additional CD25 depletion (Miltenyi Biotec) followed by CD62L+ selection was performed. T cells were stimulated with Dynabeads Human T-Expander CD3/CD28 (Invitrogen) at a 1:3 ratio (T cell:bead) overnight in X-VIVO-15 (Lonza) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 2 mM L-glutamine and different cytokine cocktails as follows: IL2/IL15 [50 U/mL IL2 (Novartis), 0. 5 ng/mL IL15 (CellGenix)]; IL15/IL7 [10 ng/mL IL15, 10 ng/mL IL7 (Miltenyi Biotec)]; IL15/IL7/IL21 [10 ng/mL IL15, 10 ng/mL IL7, 10 ng/mL IL21(Miltenyi Biotec)]; IL15 [10 ng/mL] or IL2 titrations [25, 20 or 10 U/mL IL2 (Novartis) 0 VSports app下载. 5 ng/mL IL15 (CellGenix)]. Stimulated T cells were then transduced or not with a lentivirus vector encoding the CD19-CAR or IL13Rα2-CAR as previously described (8,22,23). Mock and transduced cell cultures were given the indicated cytokines three times a week for 18–21 days of culture before subsequent analyses. For time point analyses comparing CAR-T/IL2 with CAR-T/IL15, exogenous cytokines were replaced three times per week for up to 32 days, and cells were cryopreserved at an early (days 14–16), mid (day 23) or late (day 32) time point post-bead stimulation for further detailed analyses. For rapamycin treated groups, CAR-T/IL2 cells were incubated with rapamycin (100nM) (LC Laboratories) beginning at 4 days post-bead stimulation and refreshed with media containing rapamycin three times per week.

Flow Cytometry

CAR-T cell lines were stained with fluorochrome-conjugated antibodies against the following markers: CD3, CD8, CD45, CD62L, CD27, CD45RA, CD45RO, CD127, CD95 (BD Biosciences); Lag3, PD-1 (eBioscience); Tim3 (R&D Systems); CCR7, or 2B4 (BioLegend). Staining with anti-EGFR (BioLegend) or anti-CD19 (BD Biosciences) was used as a surrogate for CAR expression in cells transduced to express CD19-CAR or IL13Rα2-CAR, respectively. For assessment of active caspase 3, CAR-T cell lines at the early, mid, and late time point were fixed and stained using the PE-Anti-Active Caspase3 Kit (BD Biosciences) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. For p-STAT5 staining, cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, followed by 10 min incubation in chilled methanol. Cells were stained with p-STAT5-Alexa Fluor 488 (BD biosciences).

For assessment of CAR-T cell proliferation and cytotoxic activity, 25,000 CD19-CAR-T cells and 25,000 tumor cells (Raji-ffluc, LCL, or KG1A) were incubated for seven days. The cell mixture was stained with anti-CD3, -CD8, and -EGFR. Absolute number of viable tumor cells and CAR-T cells was measured using flow cytometry.

For the degranulation assay, 50,000 CD19-CAR-T cells and 50,000 tumor cells (Raji-ffluc, LCL, or KG1A) were co-cultured for 5 hours in the presence of GolgiStop Protein Transport Inhibitor (BD Biosciences). The cell mixture was stained with anti-CD3, -CD8, and –EGFR followed by intracellular staining with anti-IFNγ (BD Biosciences). Degranulation assay post adoptive T cell therapy was performed as previously described (5). Briefly, intratumoral CAR-T cells were isolated post therapy and co-cultured ex vivo with tumor at a 1:1 ratio for 5 hours in the presence of GolgiStop Protein Transport Inhibitor (BD Biosciences). The cell mixture was stained with anti-CD45, -CD8, -CD107a followed by intracellular staining with anti-IFNγ and -TNFα (BD Biosciences).

Recursive killing assay was performed as previously described (5). Briefly, CAR-T/IL2 or CAR-T/IL15 cells were co-cultured with tumor (1:4 for IL13Rα2-CAR:tumor; 1:3 for CD19-CAR:tumor). CAR-T cells were rechallenged with additional tumor cells as described in the results. At the end of repetitive tumor challenge (5–7 days), viable tumor cells and CAR-T cells were counted using flow cytometry.

All samples were acquired on MACSQuant Analyzer 10 (Miltenyi Biotec) and analyzed with FlowJo software (v10.1, TreeStar) and GraphPad Prism Software (v5).

Metabolism Assays:

Mitochondrial oxygen consumption rate (OCR) was measured using the Seahorse Bioscience XF96 Extracellular Flux Analyzer (Agilent). Briefly, 0.2 or 0.4 million cells were seeded in cell culture microplates on the day of the experiment. Cells were suspended in OCR XF Assay medium (Agilent, 102365–100) supplemented with glucose (25 mM, Sigma) and sodium pyruvate (1 mM, Gibco). The pH value of the assay medium was adjusted to 7.4. OCR was measured following sequential injections of oligomycin (1 mM, Sigma), FCCP (0.5 mM, Sigma), and rotenone (2.5 mM, Sigma) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The OCR measurements were normalized to cell numbers.

To measure mitochondria membrane potential, T cells were incubated with tetramethyl rhodamine methyl ester (TMRM; Invitrogen) at a final concentration of 25 nm for 15 min at 37°C. To quantify glucose uptake, T cells were incubated with 2-NBDG (fluorescent glucose analog; Invitrogen) at a final concentration of 50 μM for 30 min at 37°C. Mean fluorescent intensity (MFI) of cells was measured using flow cytometry.

"V体育官网入口" RNA Sequencing analysis:

Thawed CD19-CAR-T cells were labelled with fluorescently-labelled anti-CD4, -CD8 (BD Biosciences), and -EGFR (BioLegend). CAR-expressing (EGFR+) CD4+ or CD8+ cell populations were separated using a BD FACSAriaII (BD Biosciences). RNA was isolated from pure CD4+ or CD8+ populations using the RNeasy Mini kit (Qiagen), and cDNA was reverse transcribed using the SuperScript VILO Mastermix (Life Technologies) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. RNA sequencing library preparation was conducted as previously described (5). The 51-bp single-ended sequence reads were mapped to human genome (hg19) using TopHat (Version 2.0.8), and the expression of Refseq genes was counted with customized R scripts. A gene was considered expressed with an RPKM (reads per kilobase of gene per million reads mapped to exons) value more than one. Only genes expressed in at least one sample were kept for differential expression analysis. The raw counts were then normalized using the TMM (weighted trimmed mean of M-values) method, and differentially expressed genes were identified by two-fold change (≥ 2 and ≤ 0.5 for up- and down-regulated genes respectively) via exactTest using the Bioconductor package “edgeR” (24).

Multidimensional scaling (MDS) analysis

Classical multidimensional analysis (MDS) plot was generated using the plotMDS function in edgeR Bioconductor package (24). Briefly, the distance matrix was computed from RNA-seq data in units of RPKM and used as input for MDS analysis. The first two coordinates of the configuration matrix are plotted with numbers corresponding to the differentially expressed genes (including both up- and down-regulated genes) with a log2 (fold change) ≥ 1 or ≤ −1 in gene expression between indicated samples. Graph corresponds to four samples: CAR-T/IL2 – Day 14, CAR-T/IL2 – Day 32, CAR-T/IL15 – Day 14 and CAR-T/IL15 – Day 32.

Immunoblot analysis

CD19-CAR-T cells were lysed in ice-cold RIPA buffer (Thermo Scientific) containing protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche). Supernatants from centrifuged whole cell lysates were prepared in 4x LDS Sample Buffer (Life Technologies) and run on a 4–12% Bis-Tris gel (Life Technologies). Gels were transferred to a 0.45μm PVDF membrane (Life Technologies) and incubated overnight at 4°C using primary antibody to Bcl2, pAkt-S473, Akt, prpS6-S235/236, rpS6, Glut1, and CPT1a (Cell Signaling); p-STAT5 (BD biosciences); actin (Abcam); or GAPDH (Millipore), then incubated with HRP-conjugated secondary antibody (Millipore) and imaged using ECL detection reagent (GE Healthcare Amersham) and TI-BA Series 2000A film processor on autoradiography film (Denville Scientific).

Q-RT-PCR analysis

At the early and late time-points, CAR-T cells were separated into CD4+ or CD8+ populations using the EasySep CD8 or CD4 Positive Selection Kits (Stem Cell Technologies), respectively. RNA was isolated using the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen). cDNA was reverse transcribed using the SuperScript VILO Mastermix (Life Technologies) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. qPCR reactions were performed as previously described (5). Primers are described in Supplementary Table S1.

In vivo xenograft models

All mouse experiments were approved by the City of Hope Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC). For CD19-CAR-T studies, NOD/Scid IL2RγCnull (NSG) mice (6–10-week-old) were injected with 0.5×106 Raji-ffluc cells (CD19+) intravenously (i.v.) on day 0. CD19-CAR-T cells or mock-transduced T cells (1×106) that were expanded in vitro under different cytokine conditions were injected i.v. into mice 3 days after tumor inoculation. For IL13Rα2-CAR-T studies, NSG mice (6–10 week-old) were injected with 0.1×106 human glioma cell line (IL13 Rα2+) intracranially (i.c.) as described before (22). On day 8, IL13Rα2-CAR-T cells or mock (5×104 cells), expanded in different cytokine conditions, were administered intratumorally. Tumor burden was monitored with Xenogen IVIS (Xenogen) or SPECTRAL Ami X (Spectral Instruments Imaging) and analyzed using Living Image 2.50 (Perkin Elmer) or AMIView software (v1.7.061, Spectral Instruments Imaging). Survival curves were generated by GraphPad Prism Software (v5). For some experiments, post-therapy, retro-orbital blood samples were RBC-lysed using PharmLyse buffer (BD Biosciences), then assessed using anti-human CD45 and anti-human CD3 antibodies (BD Biosciences) to measure the frequency of adoptively transferred T cells by flow cytometry. Assessment of CAR-T function post-therapy was conducted as previously described (5). Briefly, tumors were injected (1×106 cells) after 7 days, CAR-T/IL15 or CAR-T/IL2 was injected intratumorally. T cells were isolated and re-cultured with tumor at 1:1 ratio and degranulation assay was conducted as described above.

Statistical analysis

Statistical significance was determined using Student t test (two groups) or one-way ANOVA analysis with a Bonferroni (three or more groups). Survival was plotted using a Kaplan-Meier survival curve and statistical significance was determined by the Log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test. All analyses were carried out using GraphPad Prism software (v5). *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001; ****, P < 0.0001 as significant; ns, as not significant.

"V体育安卓版" Results:

CAR-T cells expanded ex vivo in IL15 maintain a less-differentiated phenotype (V体育官网)

Previous studies have indicated that IL2 promotes the generation of highly differentiated T cell subsets such as Tem and Teff (10,25). By comparison, IL15 is reported to promote the generation of memory T cells (11,26,27), and promote T cell survival and antitumor activity in mice (28,29). To assess whether the replacement of IL2 by IL15 may overcome this pitfall for human CAR-T cells expanded under clinically relevant manufacturing processes, we compared ex vivo expanded CD19-CAR-T cells cultured with either IL2 (CAR-T/IL2) or IL15 (CAR-T/IL15). The CD19-CAR is a second-generation CD28 CAR (30), which is currently being evaluated clinically (; ; ). For these studies, CAR-T cells were cultured in 10ng/ml IL15 or our current clinical cGMP manufacturing cytokine condition, which uses 50U/ml IL2 with low levels of IL15 (0.5ng/ml) (IL2/IL15low) (23,31). CAR-T cells cultured with IL2/IL15low (manufacturing platform) show no phenotypic differences when compared with 50 U/mL IL2 alone; therefore CAR-T cells generated from IL2/IL15low were labeled as CAR-T/IL2 (Supplementary Fig. S1). For these studies, unless otherwise stated, we also utilized our current clinical manufacturing platform, which enriches CD62L+ T cells, primarily consisting of naïve (Tn), stem cell memory (Tscm) and central memory (Tcm) subsets, for CAR-engineering. Flow cytometry analysis of selected T cells post-enrichment confirms that >85% of the T cells are CD62L+ and 55±10% are CD3+CD45RA+ CD62L+ Tn or Tscm (3 representative healthy donors; Supplementary Fig. S2).

To compare IL2 to IL15 ex vivo expansion conditions, we expanded cells over an extended period of time (up to 32 days) as this process allows the two populations to be compared for differentiation, exhaustion and apoptosis status (32). Our data indicate that throughout extended culture, CAR-T/IL15 maintains a higher proportion of T cells (both CD4+ and CD8+) that exhibit a Tscm phenotype (defined as CD95+, CD45RA+ CCR7+, CD62L+ CD27+ or CD62L+ CD127+) as compared to CAR-T/IL2 (Fig. 1A and B; Supplementary Fig. S3A), which corresponded to a higher CD45RA:CD45RO ratio for CAR-T/IL15 (Supplementary Fig. S3B). Further qPCR analysis demonstrated an up-regulation of key memory stem-like-associated transcription factors (i.e. LEF1 and TCF7) in CAR-T/IL15 as compared to CAR-T/IL2, which was confirmed with the RNA sequencing analysis conducted on purified CD4+ and CD8+subsets (Fig. 1C and D). In line with this finding, CAR-T/IL15 displayed reduced expression of genes regulating effector differentiation such as eomesodermin (EOMES), T-box 21 (TBX21), as well as cytotoxic molecules (for example, granzyme B and perforin) as compared to CAR-T/IL2 (Fig. 1E and F). Furthermore, CAR-T/IL15 cells expressed less IFNγ (a marker of Teff cells) following antigen stimulation with CD19+ Raji cells compared to CAR-T/IL2 cells (Fig. 1G and Supplementary Fig. S3C). With extended culture, we observed a decrease in the frequency of CD4+ T cells in both culture conditions, which resulted in insufficient coverage by RNA-seq for analysis on day 32 (Fig. 1D, F).

Figure 1: IL15 enriches for CAR-T cells with Tscm phenotype.

Figure 1:

Flow cytometric analysis compares frequency of Tscm population over time in CD19-CAR-T cells cultured in IL2 or IL15 as A) CD45RA+ CCR7+ T cells summarized in pie charts and B) CD62L+CD27+ and CD62L+CD127+ shown in graphs. Data shown is representative of three independent donors. C) Quantitative RT-PCR analysis of key genes upregulated in T cells with Tscm phenotype for CD4+ and CD8+ CAR-T cells. D) Heat map depicts global changes in expression of genes regulating T cell differentiation shown as robust multichip analysis (RPKM)-normalized intensity for CD4+ T cells on day 14 (left panel) and fold change from day 14 to day 32 for CD8+ T cells (right panel). E) Quantitative RT-PCR analysis of indicated effector genes in CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. F) Robust multichip analysis (RPKM)-normalized intensity of genes involved in effector function in CD8+ T cells. G) Effector function measured by flow cytometric analysis of IFNγ+ CAR-T cells after co-culturing CAR-T cells with target cells (CD19+; Raji,) at a 1:1 Effector:Target ratio for 5 hours. Data is representative of two independent studies. Data are presented as mean ± SEM and *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; ****p < 0.0001.

Next, to further assess the influence of IL15 and IL2 on CAR-T cells during ex vivo expansion, CD8+CAR+ cells from each culture condition at early and late time points (days 14 and 32) were compared for global gene expression changes. Hierarchical clustering highlighted extensive differences between the two culture conditions (Fig. 2A). Multidimensional scaling (MDS) analysis showed that by day 14 in culture, CAR-T/IL2 and CAR-T/IL15 exhibited different expression profiles (721 differentially expressed genes) and even greater differences by day 32 (1687 differentially expressed genes, P < 0.01 and greater than twofold change in expression, Fig. 2B). Extended culture over time altered the gene expression profiles more for CAR-T/IL2 cells (1674 differentially expressed genes) than CAR-T/IL15 cells (782 differentially expressed genes). Furthermore, as early as day 14, 123 genes were differentially expressed in CD4+ T cell population cultured in IL2 as compared to IL15 (Supplementary Fig. S4). These data thus confirm that CAR-T/IL15 cells retain their phenotypic characteristics in both CD4+ and CD8+ T cell populations compared to their CAR-T/IL2 counterparts.

Figure 2: IL15-cultured T cells represent a distinct, less-differentiated T cell subset.

Figure 2:

A) Hierarchical clustering shows global gene expression changes in CD8+ T cells between the two culture conditions (P< 0.01, false discovery rate <5%, Benjamini-Hochberg’s method). Yellow and blue colors indicate increased and decreased expression, respectively. B) Multidimensional scaling (MDS) analysis depicts number of genes differentially regulated in CD8+ T cells cultured in IL2 or IL15. (P< 0.01 (t test), false discovery rate <5%; twofold change in expression).

IL15 promotes T cell survival and inhibits T cell exhaustion

The role of IL2 in proliferation and activation induced cell death (AICD) is well established (33), and IL15 is a known anti-apoptotic factor in several systems (34). Inhibition of caspase-3 activity through IL15-mediated posttranslational modifications improves T cell survival (28). Further, IL15 enhances antioxidant capacity of T cells thus leading to increased T cell persistence (35). To extend these studies to the ex vivo expansion of human CAR-T cells, we evaluated the CD19-CAR-T cell apoptotic phenotype under these conditions. Our data indicate that CD19-CAR-T/IL15 cells expressed significantly less active caspase-3 compared to CAR-T/IL2 (Fig. 3A). Up-regulation of the anti-apoptotic molecule Bcl2 in CAR-T/IL15 compared with CAR-T/IL2 further confirms that IL15 exerts an anti-apoptotic effect on T cells (Fig. 3B).

Figure 3: IL15 promotes T-cell survival and prevents up-regulation of inhibitory receptors associated with T cell exhaustion.

Figure 3:

A) Intracellular active caspase-3 was measured by flow cytometry in CD19-CAR-T cells cultured in IL2 or IL15. Graph displays percent of CD3+ cells expressing active caspase-3 from three different donors (left), and one representative density plot of intracellular caspase-3 staining on day 32 (right). B) Western blot analysis shows amount of anti-apoptotic protein Bcl2 in CAR-T cells cultured in IL2 or IL15 over time. C) Flow cytometric analysis shows frequency of CAR-T cells positive for inhibitory receptors Lag3 (top) and 2B4 (bottom). Flow cytometry plots over time from one representative donor are shown (left), and bar graphs are presented as mean ± SEM from three independent donors. D) Robust multichip analysis (RPKM)-normalized intensity of LAG3 and 2B4 (CD244) genes in CD8+ T cells at Day 14 or Day 32 (top panel) and genes involved in inhibitory and suppressive function in CD4+ T cells on Day 14 (bottom panel). Data is representative of three independent studies.

*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.

T cell exhaustion is a state of dysfunction that at early and intermediate stages involves up-regulation of inhibitory receptors such as PD-1, Lag3 and 2B4 and is accompanied by reduced antitumor function (36). Exhaustion impacts CAR-T cell function and persistence, which is a barrier for effective CAR-T cell responses (37). Methods that overcome or prevent T cell exhaustion could improve the effectiveness of CAR-T therapy. To determine whether IL15 impacts T cell exhaustion, T cells were cultured for up to 32 days to allow for induction of inhibitory molecules. Although no difference in frequency of PD-1+ T cells was observed (Supplementary Fig. S5A), a significant increase in frequency of Lag3+ and 2B4+ T cells in CAR-T/IL2 over the extended culture period was detected. Up-regulation of Lag3 and 2B4 also corresponded to increase in LAG3 and CD244 (2B4) gene expression in the CD8+ population (Fig. 3C and D). As early as 14 days post ex vivo culture, CD4+ T cells cultured in IL2 showed an overall higher expression of inhibitory molecules such as CTLA4 (CTLA4), PD-1 (PDCD1), Lag3 (LAG3), PD-L1 (CD274) and suppressive cytokines and transcription factors such as IL13 and FOXP3, respectively (Fig. 3D). Taken together, these studies demonstrate that human CAR-T cells expanded in IL15 are programmed for survival and sustain a less-exhausted phenotype.

IL15-cultured CAR-T cells exhibit less mTORC1 activity and reduced expression of glycolytic enzymes

We next sought to identify alterations in signaling pathways that may explain the phenotypic and functional differences observed in cells generated in IL15 versus IL2 cytokine conditions. Multiple signal transduction pathways have been implicated in regulating cell differentiation and preserving Tscm phenotype. Although Akt plays a role in T cell effector differentiation (38), our results indicated that phosphorylation of Akt (pAkt) (Fig. 4A) in CAR-T/IL2 cells did not differ from that in CAR-T/IL15 cells. Similarly, STAT5 activation (p-STAT5), which functions downstream of cytokine signaling was also not different between the IL2 and IL15 products (Supplementary Fig. S5B). However, mTORC1 activity was decreased in CAR-T/IL15 by more than 90%, as measured by reduced phosphorylation of ribosomal protein S6 (rpS6) (Fig. 4A). mTORC1 signaling pathway is involved in metabolic changes and regulation of glucose transport (39). Specifically, mTOR signaling increases glycolysis by increasing glucose transporter GLUT1 (SLC2A1) expression and stimulating glycolytic activity (40). Consistent with this observation, IL15 reduced GLUT1expression in CAR T cells and increased expression of CPT1a (CPT1A), an enzyme that regulates fatty acid oxidation (Fig. 4A). To determine if decreased mTORC1 activity in CAR-T/IL15 cells leads to commensurate changes in expression of genes in metabolism of T cells, we evaluated expression of other enzymes involved in glycolysis and fatty acid oxidation pathways. CD19-CAR-T/IL15 had reduced expression of glycolytic enzymes and conversely increased expression of enzymes involved in fatty acid oxidation pathway (Fig. 4B and C) and exhibited overall low mitochondrial potential (Δψm) (Fig. 4D), suggesting that IL15-mediated decrease of mTORC1 activity is associated with metabolic changes in CAR-T cells. Additionally, decrease in GLUT1 expression correlated with reduced glucose uptake in CAR-T/IL15 (Fig. 4D). To determine if these gene expression and metabolic measurements were associated with functional changes in cellular metabolism, we evaluated the mitochondria oxygen consumption rate (OCR), a measure of overall mitochondrial respiration and also an indicator of oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS). Consistent with the observed phenotypic changes, CAR-T/IL15 cells exhibited greater OCR and spare respiratory capacity, a feature of long-lived memory T cells (Fig. 4E). These findings are in line with previous studies indicating that Tscm and Tcm subsets are characterized with higher OCR and exhibit low-Δψm, which correlate with superior antitumor activity and in vivo persistence (41).

Figure 4: IL15 reduces mTORC1 activity and decreases expression of glycolytic enzyme genes with a concomitant increase in fatty acid oxidation genes.

Figure 4:

A) Immunoblot analysis of indicated proteins in CD19-CAR-T cells cultured in IL2 or IL15 on day 23. GAPDH was used as a loading control. B) Quantitative RT-PCR analysis of Glut1 (SLC2A1) and CPT1a expression in CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. Results are presented relative to actin gene. C) Heat map of RNA-sequencing analysis of sorted CD8+ T cell subsets, highlighting changes in the canonical genes associated with fatty acid oxidation (FAO) (left) or glycolysis (right) represented as fold change between days 14–32. Red indicates greatest increase and white indicates no change. D) OCR of CD19-CAR-T/IL2 and CD19-CAR-T/IL15 cells in response to indicated mitochondrial modulators: oligomycin; FCCP; rotenone. E) Bar graph represents the differences in mean fluorescent intensity (MFI) of mitochondria potential (TMRM) (left panel) and glucose uptake (2-NBDG) measurements in CAR-T cells. Data is representative of two independent studies.

Lastly, to determine whether IL15-mediated reduction in mTORC1 activity is the factor that preserves the Tscm phenotype, CAR-T/IL2 cells were cultured in the presence or absence of rapamycin (mTORC1 inhibitor) and compared to CAR-T/IL15. Expanding CAR-T/IL2 in the presence of rapamycin promoted a Tscm phenotype, similar to CAR-T/IL15 (Fig. 5A and 5B). Western blot analysis confirms down-regulation of p-rpS6 and Glut1 and up-regulation of CPT1a and Bcl2 in CAR-T/IL15 and IL2 plus rapamycin-cultured cells (Fig. 5C). Collectively, these data demonstrate that IL15-mediated reduction in mTORC1 activity leads to decreased glycolysis and prevents T cell differentiation.

Figure 5: Reduced mTORC1 activity is responsible for IL15 maintenance of a Tscm phenotype.

Figure 5:

A) Flow cytometry analysis shows changes in CD45RA+ CCR7+ CD19-CAR-T cells cultured in IL2, IL15 or IL2 + rapamycin (100nM) (top), summarized in a pie chart (bottom). B) Bar graph shows changes in the frequency of CD62L+CD27+ and CD62L+CD127+ T cells cultured in above conditions. Data presented are mean ± SEM of two experiments. C) Immunoblot analysis of p-rpS6, rpS6, Glut1, CPT1a, and Bcl2 proteins confirms reduced mTORC1 and phenotypic similarities in T cells cultured in IL15 and IL2 + rapamycin. GAPDH was used as a loading control. Data is representative of two independent studies.

Enhanced proliferative capacity of CAR-T/IL15 cells correlates with antitumor activity and persistence

The phenotypic differences observed in CAR-T/IL15 compared to CAR-T/IL2 indicated that IL15 was superior at preserving the stem-like properties of T cells, which has been previously shown to correlate with improved antitumor potency (11). We therefore compared the in vitro antitumor effects of CD19-CAR-T/IL2 and CAR-T/IL15 cells against CD19+ Raji tumor cells in a 7-day co-culture assay. Upon tumor antigen stimulation, CAR-T/IL15 exhibited 1.5-fold higher proliferative capacity and persistence and maintained superior overall in vitro killing capacity as compared to CAR-T/IL2 (Fig. 6A and B). To further evaluate recursive killing capacity of each population, CAR-T cells were rechallenged with additional tumor cells. At the end of repetitive tumor challenge, CAR-T/IL15 cells outperformed CAR-T/IL2 cells in tumor killing capacity (Supplementary Fig. S5C).

Figure 6: CAR-T cells cultured in IL15 exhibit enhanced proliferative capacity with superior antitumor activity:

Figure 6:

A) CD19-CAR-T cells were co-cultured with tumor cells (CD19+; Raji) at a 1:1 Effector:Target ratio for 7 days, then number of A) tumor cells and B) CAR-T cells were counted by flow cytometry and graphed. Mice bearing Raji-ffLuc lymphoma (0.5×106) were untreated or treated with 1×106 mock or CD19-CAR-T cells three days after tumor engraftment. T cells were thawed and injected i.v. after cryopreservation at the indicated number of days in ex vivo culture. C) Bioluminescent images compare tumor progression 19 days after adoptive transfer of T cells (n=6–8 mice per group). D) Bioluminescent flux plot quantifying tumor burden in response to different treatment groups over time. Data is shown as mean ± SEM. E) Kaplan-Meier survival curve depicts overall survival. F) Frequency of circulating CAR-T cells 10 days post CAR-T cell therapy identified by flow cytometry using anti-human CD3 and CD45 (left) and bar graph summarizes the frequency of human T cells identified in each group (right). G) Bar graph summarizes the number of CAR-T cells/ml of blood from day 14 groups. Data are presented as mean ± SEM of 6–8 individual animals and two independent studies.

*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; ****p < 0.0001.

Lastly, we compared how extended culture conditions in either IL15 or IL2 can impact CAR-T cell antitumor activity in vivo. CD19-CAR-T/IL2 or CAR-T/IL15 cells expanded for 14 or 32 days were administered to mice bearing Raji-ffluc tumors, an aggressive CD19+ lymphoma mouse model. The adoptive transfer of CAR-T/IL15 cells mediated superior antitumor activity as measured by ffluc flux and promoted significantly greater survival advantage than CAR-T/IL2 at both culture time-points (Fig. 6CE). CAR-T/IL15 cells expanded for 32 days showed similar efficacy as CAR-T/IL2 cells expanded for only 14 days. In line with these findings, CAR-T/IL15 cells exhibited significantly longer persistence than CAR-T/IL2 cells at both early and late expansion period (Fig. 6F and G). CAR-T/IL2 cells taken from extended culture condition (Day 32) exhibited the lowest persistence 7 days after infusion, which correlated with the least efficacious survival outcome (Fig. 6E). Together these data indicate that CAR-T/IL15 cells outperform CAR-T/IL2 cells in antitumor potency both in vitro and in vivo and furthermore, the negative impact of extended culture is partially rescued by culture in IL15.

IL15-mediated effects are observed across various manufacturing processes and CAR designs

To evaluate whether the phenotypic profile of CAR-T/IL15 cells was also observed in PBMC-derived CAR-T cell products, we also assessed the phenotypic changes for PBMC-expanded CAR-T cells cultured in IL2 compared to IL15. As anticipated, PBMC-derived CD19-CAR-T cells, which contain Tn, Tscm, and Tcm, also exhibited IL15-mediated phenotypic changes, which include maintenance of Tscm phenotype (CCR7+CD45RA+; CD62L+CD27+; CD62L+CD127+) and enhanced proliferative capacity upon antigen stimulation (Supplementary Fig. S6A and B). Furthermore, PBMC-derived CAR-T cells cultured in IL15 also exhibited increased expression of Bcl2 and reduced mTORC1 activity as indicated by reduced expression of p-rpS6 (Supplementary Fig. S6C). In vivo, both PBMC- and CD62L+-derived CAR-T cells cultured in IL15 showed superior survival benefit compared to IL2-cultured cells (Supplementary Fig. S6D). Together these data suggest that IL15 has similar biological impact on CAR-T cells derived from unselected T cell populations.

To determine whether the phenotypic and functional characteristics observed for CAR-T/IL15 cells were generalizable to other CAR designs, similar studies were conducted using our glioma-targeted IL13Rα2-CAR-T cells, which utilize a 4–1BB costimulatory domain (22). IL13Rα2-CAR-T cells cultured with IL15 also sustained their stem-like phenotype and remained less exhausted when compared with IL2 cultured cells (Supplementary Fig. S7A and B). Similar to CD19-CAR-T cells, IL13Rα2-CAR-T cells cultured in IL15 also exhibited reduced mTORC1 activity and GLUT1 expression, which correlated with greater OCR, low Δψm, and decreased glucose uptake (Supplementary Fig. S7C and D). Furthermore, intratumoral CAR-T/IL15 cells exhibit a greater polyfunctional phenotype (TNFα+ CD107a+ and IFNγ+TNFα+) as compared to CAR-T/IL2 cells (Supplementary Fig. S7E). IL13Rα2-CAR-T cells cultured with IL15 exhibited greater antitumor activity upon multiple tumor rechallenge in vitro as well as in vivo against orthotopic GBM tumors (Supplementary Fig. S7F and G). Together these studies suggest that the effect of IL15 is independent of CAR design (CD28 or 4–1BB costim) as both CD19 and IL13Rα2-CAR-T products exhibited similar phenotypic and metabolic advantages when cultured in IL15 alone as compared to expansion in IL2.

"V体育安卓版" Inclusion of other γc-cytokines with IL15 does not improve antitumor activity

Our studies highlight the benefit of culturing in IL15 as compared to IL2. Previous reports demonstrate a benefit in combining IL15 with other cytokine combinations for the ex vivo expansion of human T cells, particularly IL21(42) or IL7 (2). With the goal of defining the optimal condition for the production of improved CAR-T cells, additional cytokine combinations (IL7/IL15 and IL7/IL15/IL21) (2,1315) were assessed. CAR-T/IL15 cells expressed a more prominent CD45RA+CCR7+ and CD62L+CD27+ less-differentiated memory phenotype compared to cells in other culture conditions (Fig. 7A). Further, addition of IL7 and/or IL21 with IL15 increased expression of inhibitory receptors such as Lag3 and 2B4 as compared to IL15 alone (Fig. 7B). The observed changes were detected in both CD4+ and CD8+ T cell subsets, with CD8+ T cells showing a larger difference in phenotypes between the cytokine culture conditions (Fig. 7A and 7B). T cells cultured in IL7/IL15/IL21 exhibited the least favorable phenotype, defined as increased expression of inhibitory molecules and very low frequency of CD45RA+CCR7+ T cells (7±5 %) (Fig. 7A and B). These studies indicate that addition of other γc-cytokines to the culture condition does not result in a superior CAR-T product.

Figure 7: Inclusion of additional γc cytokines with IL15 reduces antitumor activity.

Figure 7:

A) Flow cytometric analysis of CD19-CAR-T cells cultured in different cytokine combination 18–20 days after initiation of culture showing frequency of CD45RA+ CCR7+ and CD27+ CD62L+ CAR-T cells (left). Histogram plot showing CCR7 expression in total CD8+ T cells (right). Bar graph shows percentage of CD27 expressing CD8+ T cells. B) Flow cytometric analysis of indicated inhibitory molecules gated on CAR-T cells (left). Bar graphs showing frequency of CD8+ T cells expressing 2B4 (top) and Lag3 (bottom). C) Bioluminescent flux plot (left) and images (right) and D) Kaplan-Meier survival curves compares tumor progression over time in treated and untreated groups (n=6–8 mice per group). Representative of two independent experiments. E) Comparison of inhibitory receptor expressions on CAR-T cells harvested from animals 17 days post therapy (n=3–5 mice per group). Data is representative of two independent studies.

To compare how CAR-T cells cultured in various cytokine conditions perform in vivo, CD19-CAR-T cells cultured in IL2 (i.e., clinical cGMP manufacturing condition IL2/IL15low), IL15, IL7/IL15, IL7/IL2/IL15 were adoptively transferred at a suboptimal dose against mice bearing CD19+ Raji-ffluc tumors. In vivo assessment of CAR-T cell products showed superior antitumor activity of CD19-CAR-T cells cultured in IL15, as compared to other cytokine conditions (Fig. 7C and D). Additional γc-cytokines in culture condition resulted in a less efficacious CAR product even with relatively comparable CAR and CD4/CD8 T-cell composition (Supplementary Fig. S8AD). Furthermore, assessment of T cells isolated from blood post CAR-T therapy showed reduced expression of inhibitory molecules (PD-1, Lag3, 2B4) in CAR-T/IL15 group (Fig. 7E), as compared to other cytokine combinations. Reducing the IL2 concentration did not enhance antitumor activity of CAR-T cells. The phenotypic characteristics of low dose IL2 was similar to standard IL2 (Supplementary Fig. S9AC). Together this data highlights the impact of IL15 on T cells as compared with other cytokine culture conditions and suggests that inclusion of other γc-cytokines with IL15 can reduce the beneficial properties of IL15 alone.

Discussion:

Considerable progress has been made in improving the CAR-T cell technology to obtain cell products that result in enhanced persistence/expansion and antitumor response. Studies have shown benefits for using IL15/IL7 in culture (2) or IL15 as part of the CAR cassette (43,44). However, little is known about the IL15-mediated intracellular signaling that modulates the formation and maintenance of a less-differentiated T cell phenotype, including Tscm, and its role in antitumor activity (11). Sustaining the Tscm population during ex vivo expansion prior to adoptive T cell therapy is challenging as culture conditions often result in undesired effect of promoting the development of terminally differentiated T cells. Here, we demonstrate that the use of IL15 alone in the culture conditions for CAR-T cell generation preserves Tscm phenotype and results in enhanced antitumor activity and self-renewing capacity. We further show that CAR-T/IL15 down-regulates the mTOR activity, which results in a global decrease in expression of glycolytic enzymes and subsequent increase in expression of FAO-related enzymes. Together these phenotypic characteristics resulted in CAR-T cells with superior cellular metabolism. Furthermore, we show that IL15-mediated reduction of mTORC1 is responsible for preserving the Tscm population, which is the first reported in the context of ex vivo expansion of CAR-T cells.

Efforts have been made to pharmacologically induce formation of memory T cells, using TWS119 (Gsk3b blockade; activator of Wnt signaling), rapamycin (mTORC1 inhibitor) (20,21), metformin (AMPK activator) (17) or 2DG (Hk2 inhibitor) (16). Although the physiologic role of these molecules in post-thymic T cell development remains unknown, studies have suggested that these pathways can regulate T cell differentiation and memory T cell formation. In particular, targeting the mTOR pathway in mice results in increased formation of memory T cells, characterized by cell surface expression of CD62L and CD127 and more of the anti-apoptotic molecule, Bcl-2(21). mTORC1 activity regulates expression of genes involved in glycolysis (39). mTOR-mediated induction of glycolysis also promotes T cell differentiation and formation of terminally differentiated effector T cells (21,45). In our study, we observed that CAR-T/IL15, but not CAR-T/IL2, exhibits reduced mTORC1 activity, which was associated with down-regulation of key glycolytic enzymes. This metabolic switch was associated with improved persistence and antitumor activity of the CAR-T cells in two different tumor models (i.e., lymphoma and glioblastoma). In order to directly test that reduced mTORC1 and global glycolytic enzyme expression and changes in the metabolic activity is responsible for preserving the Tscm population, T cells cultured in IL2 were treated with rapamycin, an mTORC1 inhibitor. CAR-T/IL2 cultured in the presence of rapamycin exhibited similar phenotypic characteristics as CAR-T/IL15 suggesting that IL15 preserves the Tscm population by reducing mTORC1 activity. Overall these findings are in line with now mounting evidence that metabolic pathways in T cells play a role in the regulation of T cell longevity and function (46).

Another undesired effect of ex vivo expansion of T cells is the potential to generate exhausted T cells, which leads to limited persistence and antitumor efficacy in vivo (37). Here we report that in CAR-T/IL15 cells, exposure to IL15 prevented the up-regulation of the inhibitory molecules 2B4 and Lag3. We also demonstrate that the percentage of cells exhibiting apoptotic features (increased active caspase-3 and reduced Bcl2 expression) was reduced in CAR-T/IL15, which is consistent with previous reports on the anti-apoptotic functions of IL15 (28,33). Together these phenotypic changes may account for the superior antitumor activity observed in CAR-T/IL15 cells in tumor-bearing hosts.

The effect of IL15 on CD8+ T cells has been documented (29,47). Conversely, the influence of IL15 on CD4+ T cells remains unclear. Although some reports have indicated that IL15 promotes the expansion of effector CD4+ T cell and its requirement for maintenance of memory-like CD4+ T cells, others have shown that IL15 may increase the proliferation of CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells (48,49). In our study, when comparing CD4+ and CD8+ T cell populations in the bulk T cell product (via flow cytometry, qPCR and RNA sequencing), it was evident that both CD8+and CD4+ T cells shared similar phenotypic characteristics such as decreased caspase-3 activity, sustained Tscm phenotype and reduced expression of exhaustion markers. Based on these observations, we believe that although there may be intrinsic differences between CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in response to IL15, CD4+ and CD8+ T cells share regulatory pathways that contribute to the superior antitumor activity observed in the final bulk CAR-T cell product.

Arrest of lymphocyte differentiation to maintain long-lived, self-renewing antigen-experienced T cells with stem-like properties remains a goal for development of efficient antitumor adoptive T cell therapy (11,50). Selection of less-differentiated memory T cell populations prior to ex vivo expansion and use of signaling inhibitors that prevent T cell differentiation are other strategies for increasing the number of less-differentiated T cells available for adoptive T cell therapy. Our study shows that signaling mediated by IL15 preserves the Tscm phenotype in CAR-T cells during ex vivo expansion and subsequent adoptive transfer in vivo. We demonstrate that these phenotypic differences are relevant in the context of our second-generation CD19 and IL13Rα2-CARs that utilize CD28 and 4–1BB costimulation, respectively, and thus appear to be intrinsic to the T cells and independent of CAR design. We also find that the Tscm phenotype is preserved for both PBMC- and CD62L+-derived CAR-T cell products cultured in IL15. The ability to modulate the ex vivo expansion conditions to promote and sustain Tscm population has considerable implications for the field of adoptive T cell immunotherapy, specifically CAR-T therapy. Apart from the role of IL15 in preserving Tscm, IL15 has also been shown to “rescue” tolerant T cells by restoring their proliferative and antitumor activity (47), which also has implications as T cell tolerance impacts antitumor immune response. Lastly, the use of IL15 to induce long-lived T cell memory subsets via reduced mTORC activity furthers the advancement of successful T cell-based therapies.

Supplementary Material

1

Synopsis:

IL15 promotes metabolically fit CAR-T cells with a less-differentiated stem cell memory phenotype. Addition of IL15 is a clinically translatable method for improving the antitumor function of ex vivo expanded CAR-T cells, which could improve outcomes for patients.

Acknowledgments:

This work was supported in part by Mustang Bio., Inc., City of Hope Lymphoma SPORE grant P50 CA107399, Cancer Center Support Grant P30 CA33572 and R01CA220693–01. Patents associated with CAR design, T cell manufacturing and delivery have been licensed by Mustang Bio., Inc., for which S.J.F. and C.E.B. receive licensing and consulting payments. All other authors declare no potential conflicts of interest. The authors acknowledge the editorial assistance provided by Dr. Julie R. Ostberg and would also like to thank City of Hope Bioinformatics core specially Drs. Shu Tao and Xiwei Wu for their help with the RNA sequencing analysis.

Footnotes

Conflict of Interest

Patents associated with IL13Rα2-CAR-T have been licensed by Mustang Bio., Inc., for which S.J.F. and C.E.B. receive royalty payments. All other authors declare no potential conflicts of interest.

Reference: (V体育平台登录)

  • 1.Kawalekar OU, OC RS, Fraietta JA, Guo L, McGettigan SE, Posey AD Jr., et al. Distinct Signaling of Coreceptors Regulates Specific Metabolism Pathways and Impacts Memory Development in CAR T Cells. Immunity 2016;44:712. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Xu Y, Zhang M, Ramos CA, Durett A, Liu E, Dakhova O, et al. Closely related T-memory stem cells correlate with in vivo expansion of CAR.CD19-T cells and are preserved by IL-7 and IL-15. Blood 2014;123:3750–9 ["V体育2025版" DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Zhang H, Snyder KM, Suhoski MM, Maus MV, Kapoor V, June CH, et al. 4–1BB is superior to CD28 costimulation for generating CD8+ cytotoxic lymphocytes for adoptive immunotherapy. Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md : 1950) 2007;179:4910–8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Song DG, Ye Q, Carpenito C, Poussin M, Wang LP, Ji C, et al. In vivo persistence, tumor localization, and antitumor activity of CAR-engineered T cells is enhanced by costimulatory signaling through CD137 (4–1BB). Cancer research 2011;71:4617–27 ["V体育官网入口" DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Wang D, Aguilar B, Starr R, Alizadeh D, Brito A, Sarkissian A, et al. Glioblastoma-targeted CD4+ CAR T cells mediate superior antitumor activity. JCI insight 2018;3 [DOI (VSports注册入口)] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Rosenberg SA. IL-2: the first effective immunotherapy for human cancer. Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md : 1950) 2014;192:5451–8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Gattinoni L, Zhong XS, Palmer DC, Ji Y, Hinrichs CS, Yu Z, et al. Wnt signaling arrests effector T cell differentiation and generates CD8+ memory stem cells. Nature medicine 2009;15:808–13 [DOI (VSports最新版本)] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Wang X, Chang WC, Wong CW, Colcher D, Sherman M, Ostberg JR, et al. A transgene-encoded cell surface polypeptide for selection, in vivo tracking, and ablation of engineered cells. Blood 2011;118:1255–63 [DOI (VSports手机版)] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Berger C, Jensen MC, Lansdorp PM, Gough M, Elliott C, Riddell SR. Adoptive transfer of effector CD8+ T cells derived from central memory cells establishes persistent T cell memory in primates. The Journal of clinical investigation 2008;118:294–305 ["VSports手机版" DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Gattinoni L, Klebanoff CA, Palmer DC, Wrzesinski C, Kerstann K, Yu Z, et al. Acquisition of full effector function in vitro paradoxically impairs the in vivo antitumor efficacy of adoptively transferred CD8+ T cells. The Journal of clinical investigation 2005;115:1616–26 ["VSports最新版本" DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Gattinoni L, Lugli E, Ji Y, Pos Z, Paulos CM, Quigley MF, et al. A human memory T cell subset with stem cell-like properties. Nature medicine 2011;17:1290–7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Rochman Y, Spolski R, Leonard WJ. New insights into the regulation of T cells by gamma(c) family cytokines. Nature reviews Immunology 2009;9:480–90 [VSports注册入口 - DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Cieri N, Camisa B, Cocchiarella F, Forcato M, Oliveira G, Provasi E, et al. IL-7 and IL-15 instruct the generation of human memory stem T cells from naive precursors. Blood 2013;121:573–84 ["VSports最新版本" DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Santegoets SJ, Turksma AW, Suhoski MM, Stam AG, Albelda SM, Hooijberg E, et al. IL-21 promotes the expansion of CD27+ CD28+ tumor infiltrating lymphocytes with high cytotoxic potential and low collateral expansion of regulatory T cells. Journal of translational medicine 2013;11:37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Singh H, Figliola MJ, Dawson MJ, Huls H, Olivares S, Switzer K, et al. Reprogramming CD19-specific T cells with IL-21 signaling can improve adoptive immunotherapy of B-lineage malignancies. Cancer research 2011;71:3516–27 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Sukumar M, Liu J, Ji Y, Subramanian M, Crompton JG, Yu Z, et al. Inhibiting glycolytic metabolism enhances CD8+ T cell memory and antitumor function. The Journal of clinical investigation 2013;123:4479–88 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Pearce EL, Walsh MC, Cejas PJ, Harms GM, Shen H, Wang LS, et al. Enhancing CD8 T-cell memory by modulating fatty acid metabolism. Nature 2009;460:103–7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Sinclair LV, Rolf J, Emslie E, Shi YB, Taylor PM, Cantrell DA. Control of amino-acid transport by antigen receptors coordinates the metabolic reprogramming essential for T cell differentiation. Nature immunology 2013;14:500–8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Li Q, Rao RR, Araki K, Pollizzi K, Odunsi K, Powell JD, et al. A central role for mTOR kinase in homeostatic proliferation induced CD8+ T cell memory and tumor immunity. Immunity 2011;34:541–53 [VSports注册入口 - DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Araki K, Youngblood B, Ahmed R. The role of mTOR in memory CD8 T-cell differentiation. Immunological reviews 2010;235:234–43 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Araki K, Turner AP, Shaffer VO, Gangappa S, Keller SA, Bachmann MF, et al. mTOR regulates memory CD8 T-cell differentiation. Nature 2009;460:108–12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Brown CE, Aguilar B, Starr R, Yang X, Chang WC, Weng L, et al. Optimization of IL13Ralpha2-Targeted Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells for Improved Anti-tumor Efficacy against Glioblastoma. Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy 2018;26:31–44 [VSports最新版本 - DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Wang X, Popplewell LL, Wagner JR, Naranjo A, Blanchard MS, Mott MR, et al. Phase 1 studies of central memory-derived CD19 CAR T-cell therapy following autologous HSCT in patients with B-cell NHL. Blood 2016;127:2980–90 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Robinson MD, McCarthy DJ, Smyth GK. edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics 2010;26:139–40 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Boyman O, Sprent J. The role of interleukin-2 during homeostasis and activation of the immune system. Nature reviews Immunology 2012;12:180–90 ["VSports最新版本" DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Zhang X, Sun S, Hwang I, Tough DF, Sprent J. Potent and selective stimulation of memory-phenotype CD8+ T cells in vivo by IL-15. Immunity 1998;8:591–9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Sandau MM, Kohlmeier JE, Woodland DL, Jameson SC. IL-15 regulates both quantitative and qualitative features of the memory CD8 T cell pool. Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md : 1950) 2010;184:35–44 ["VSports在线直播" DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Saligrama PT, Fortner KA, Secinaro MA, Collins CC, Russell JQ, Budd RC. IL-15 maintains T-cell survival via S-nitrosylation-mediated inhibition of caspase-3. Cell death and differentiation 2014;21:904–14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Klebanoff CA, Finkelstein SE, Surman DR, Lichtman MK, Gattinoni L, Theoret MR, et al. IL-15 enhances the in vivo antitumor activity of tumor-reactive CD8+ T cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2004;101:1969–74 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Jonnalagadda M, Mardiros A, Urak R, Wang X, Hoffman LJ, Bernanke A, et al. Chimeric antigen receptors with mutated IgG4 Fc spacer avoid fc receptor binding and improve T cell persistence and antitumor efficacy. Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy 2015;23:757–68 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Brown CE, Alizadeh D, Starr R, Weng L, Wagner JR, Naranjo A, et al. Regression of Glioblastoma after Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy. The New England journal of medicine 2016;375:2561–9 ["V体育2025版" DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Kaartinen T, Luostarinen A, Maliniemi P, Keto J, Arvas M, Belt H, et al. Low interleukin-2 concentration favors generation of early memory T cells over effector phenotypes during chimeric antigen receptor T-cell expansion. Cytotherapy 2017;19:1130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Li XC, Demirci G, Ferrari-Lacraz S, Groves C, Coyle A, Malek TR, et al. IL-15 and IL-2: a matter of life and death for T cells in vivo. Nature medicine 2001;7:114–8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Marks-Konczalik J, Dubois S, Losi JM, Sabzevari H, Yamada N, Feigenbaum L, et al. IL-2-induced activation-induced cell death is inhibited in IL-15 transgenic mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2000;97:11445–50 ["VSports手机版" DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Kaur N, Naga OS, Norell H, Al-Khami AA, Scheffel MJ, Chakraborty NG, et al. T cells expanded in presence of IL-15 exhibit increased antioxidant capacity and innate effector molecules. Cytokine 2011;55:307–17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Wherry EJ. T cell exhaustion. Nature immunology 2011;12:492–9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Long AH, Haso WM, Shern JF, Wanhainen KM, Murgai M, Ingaramo M, et al. 4–1BB costimulation ameliorates T cell exhaustion induced by tonic signaling of chimeric antigen receptors. Nature medicine 2015;21:581–90 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Crompton JG, Sukumar M, Roychoudhuri R, Clever D, Gros A, Eil RL, et al. Akt inhibition enhances expansion of potent tumor-specific lymphocytes with memory cell characteristics. Cancer research 2015;75:296–305 [V体育平台登录 - DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Duvel K, Yecies JL, Menon S, Raman P, Lipovsky AI, Souza AL, et al. Activation of a metabolic gene regulatory network downstream of mTOR complex 1. Molecular cell 2010;39:171–83 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Man K, Kallies A. Synchronizing transcriptional control of T cell metabolism and function. Nature reviews Immunology 2015;15:574–84 [VSports - DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Sukumar M, Liu J, Mehta GU, Patel SJ, Roychoudhuri R, Crompton JG, et al. Mitochondrial Membrane Potential Identifies Cells with Enhanced Stemness for Cellular Therapy. Cell metabolism 2016;23:63–76 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Zeng R, Spolski R, Finkelstein SE, Oh S, Kovanen PE, Hinrichs CS, et al. Synergy of IL-21 and IL-15 in regulating CD8+ T cell expansion and function. The Journal of experimental medicine 2005;201:139–48 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Hurton LV, Singh H, Najjar AM, Switzer KC, Mi T, Maiti S, et al. Tethered IL-15 augments antitumor activity and promotes a stem-cell memory subset in tumor-specific T cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2016;113:E7788–E97 [DOI (V体育官网)] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Krenciute G, Prinzing BL, Yi Z, Wu MF, Liu H, Dotti G, et al. Transgenic Expression of IL15 Improves Antiglioma Activity of IL13Ralpha2-CAR T Cells but Results in Antigen Loss Variants. Cancer immunology research 2017;5:571–81 [VSports app下载 - DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Xu X, Ye L, Araki K, Ahmed R. mTOR, linking metabolism and immunity. Seminars in immunology 2012;24:429–35 [DOI (V体育安卓版)] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Chang CH, Pearce EL. Emerging concepts of T cell metabolism as a target of immunotherapy. Nature immunology 2016;17:364–8 ["V体育平台登录" DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Teague RM, Sather BD, Sacks JA, Huang MZ, Dossett ML, Morimoto J, et al. Interleukin-15 rescues tolerant CD8+ T cells for use in adoptive immunotherapy of established tumors. Nature medicine 2006;12:335–41 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Purton JF, Tan JT, Rubinstein MP, Kim DM, Sprent J, Surh CD. Antiviral CD4+ memory T cells are IL-15 dependent. The Journal of experimental medicine 2007;204:951–61 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Xu S, Sun Z, Sun Y, Zhu J, Li X, Zhang X, et al. IL-15 and dendritic cells induce proliferation of CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells from peripheral blood. Immunology letters 2011;140:59–67 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Klebanoff CA, Gattinoni L, Torabi-Parizi P, Kerstann K, Cardones AR, Finkelstein SE, et al. Central memory self/tumor-reactive CD8+ T cells confer superior antitumor immunity compared with effector memory T cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2005;102:9571–6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data (V体育安卓版)

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1

"V体育平台登录" RESOURCES