Abstract
We report the isolation of a room temperature stable dipyrromethene Cu(O2) complex featuring a side-on O2 coordination V体育ios版. Reactivity studies highlight the unique ability of the dioxygen adduct for both hydrogen-atom abstraction and acid/base chemistry towards phenols, demonstrating that side-on superoxide species can be reactive entities.
V体育2025版 - Graphical Abstract

A stable Cu–dioxygen adduct is observed that effects both H–atom abstraction and O–atom transfer chemistry.
Activation of dioxygen by copper systems plays an essential role in both biological1–3 and abiological4–6 transformations V体育平台登录. Studies on natural enzymes and synthetic complexes have identified structural motifs of mono-, di-, and tri-copper sites with varying degrees of dioxygen activation (superoxide, peroxide, oxo), and consequently distinct reactivity profiles. 7–11 As such, elucidating the correlation between the initially generated 1:1 Cu(O2) adduct and the subsequent reactivity of this intermediate towards substrates is essential for rationally designing synthetic systems competent for selective oxidation chemistry.
Among the Cu(O2) adducts isolated to date,12–27 both end-on and side-on coordination of dioxygen have been observed to afford a CuII-superoxide unit that features either a triplet (end-on bound)12–21 or a diamagnetic (side-on bound)22–25, 27 ground state. Reactivity studies identified the ability of terminally bound Cu(O2) complexes to engage in hydrogen-atom abstraction (HAA)12, 14–18 from weak C–H and phenol O–H bonds or acid/base chemistry,14, 19 whereas no such transformations can be effected at a side-on Cu(κ2–O2) complex VSports注册入口. 23 In line with these observations, DFT investigations suggested that less electron donating ligands could increase the oxidative potency of such Cu(O2) complexes by inducing a Cu superoxide and, therefore, electrophilic character. 23.
Using weak-field dipyrromethene ligands, our group has demonstrated the stabilization of a unique ferric iminyl species that is competent for C–H amination. 28, 29 Encouraged by these results, we set out to probe the potential of this weakly donating scaffold to similarly stabilize a dipyrrin copper superoxide complex and explore its reactivity. Herein, we report the isolation of a side-on Cu(κ2–O2) complex that persists at room temperature and yet manifests both HAA and acid/base chemistry towards phenolic O–H bonds V体育官网入口.
Metalation of (ArL)Li with CuCl in tetrahydrofuran affords (ArL)CuI (1) (ArL: 5-mesityl-1,9-(2,4,6-Ph3-C6H2)dipyrrin28). X-ray diffraction studies on single crystals obtained from a concentrated hexanes solution of 1 reveal a three-coordinate copper centre featuring an η2-interaction with one of the ortho-phenyl groups of the 2,4,6-Ph3-C6H2 substituent (Fig. 1a). Treatment of 1 with strongly donating functionalities such as acetonitrile or ammonia displaces the bound arene to afford the corresponding solvento adducts (Fig VSports在线直播. S7, ESI†). Upon exposure to vacuum, however, complete removal of these exogenous ligands is observed, demonstrating the inherent stability of the η2-coordination.
V体育ios版 - Fig. 1.
Solid state molecular structures for (a) (ArL)Cu (1) and (b) (ArL)Cu(O2) (2) with thermal ellipsoids at 50% probability level V体育2025版. Color scheme: Cu, aquamarine; N, blue; O, red. Hydrogens and solvent molecules are omitted for clarity.
Addition of a stoichiometric amount of dioxygen to a frozen benzene solution of 1 results in immediate colour change from purple (λmax 575 nm) to dark pink (λmax 545 nm) upon thawing the reaction mixture, along with formation of new diamagnetic resonances in the 1H NMR spectrum; however, full consumption of 1 is not observed (Fig. S9, ESI†). Diffusion of pentane into a saturated benzene solution of 1 under an atmosphere of O2 afforded crystals suitable for X-ray diffraction, providing structural evidence for a side-on bound O2 adduct (ArL)Cu(O2) (2). The solid state molecular structure (Fig. 1b) displays an elongated O–O bond (1. 383(2) Å) compared to typical superoxide moieties (1. 2–1. 3 Å),9, 23, 30–34 more in line with a doubly reduced O2 moiety (~1. 4 Å). 9, 23, 30–34 The Cu–O bond lengths of 1. 8306(11) and 1. 8360(12) Å, respectively, are also indicative of a strong covalent interaction. Further, the average Cu–Ndipyrrin bond lengths of 2 (1. 878(2) Å) are significantly shorter compared to those observed in several authentic dipyrrinato CuII species ((ArL)CuCl: 1. 890(2) Å; (ArL)Cu(OEt): 1. 919(3) Å; (ArL)Cu(OPh): 1. 904(1) Å, ESI†). However, an anilido imine supported side-on Cu(κ2–O2) species featuring an O–O bond length of 1 VSports. 392(3) Å and similarly contracted Cu–O and Cu–N bond lengths27 was recently reassigned as a CuII superoxide unit based on Cu K pre-edge XANES data as opposed to the originally proposed CuIII peroxide formulation. 35 Finally, resonance Raman on 2 did not provide a definitive νO–O as the anticipated region8 (Fig. S12–13, ESI†). As such, a definitive description of 2 as either a CuIII peroxide or a CuII superoxide is not possible.
Preliminary DFT investigations36 using crystallographically determined parameters identified a closed-shell singlet ground state with the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (MO) depicting the σ* interactions between the dxz orbital and both the dipyrrin ligand and the O2 moiety. Given the weak ligand field of the dipyrrin scaffold and its influence on electronic structure evidenced in our previous studies28, 29 as well as the multi-configurational character described for such side-on copper dioxygen species,22, 24 we chose to further examine the electronic structure of 2. As discussed in literature reports,35 the broken symmetry (BS) approach fails to provide a satisfactory result for these Cu(O2) systems, and indeed, we were unable to converge to a BS solution corresponding to a cupric centre antiferromagnetically coupled to a superoxide radical. However, following a similar protocol35 applied for the two crystallographically characterized side-on Cu(κ2–O2) complexes,22,24 the use of a complete active space self-consistent field (CASSCF) method reveals the complex electronic nature of 2. A CAS(2,2) reference space on a truncated model of 2 (see ESI†) identified the two σ(dxz + π*O2) and σ*(dxz – π*O2) active MOs (Fig. S8a, Table S2, ESI†) VSports app下载. Subsequent localization of these MOs (Fig. S8b, ESI†) and analysis of the resulting wavefunctions with respect to a valence bond description unveiled 87. 1% contributions from the CuII(O2•–) configuration, with 9. 4% and 3. 5% participation of the CuI(O20) and CuIII(O22–) states, respectively (Table S3, ESI†). These results are consistent with those calculated for the analogous β-diketiminato Cu(κ2–O2) adduct35 and suggest a significant CuII-superoxide character for 2.
Complex 2 exhibits interesting properties and reactivity profile. Unlike the previously characterized Cu(O2) species, which tend to decay above –25 °C,2,9,14,17,19,22–24 2 is surprisingly persistent in solution at room temperature. However, despite the relatively strong Cu(O2) interaction, the η2-arene association is still preferred; exposure of in situ generated 2 to vacuum results in conversion to the starting CuI complex 1 (Fig. S9, ESI†), akin to the behaviour reported for a tris(pyrazolyl)borate side-on bound CuII superoxide.22 Additionally, variable temperature 1H NMR studies identified an equilibrium between 1 and 2, justifying the incomplete generation of 2 at room temperature even in the presence of excess dioxygen. O2 binding is favoured at lower temperatures, with full conversion to 2 observed in situ at –15 °C (Fig. S10, ESI†) and oxygen release noted upon warming the reaction mixture back to room temperature. Such temperature dependent reversible O2 binding has been previously described for a tris(tetramethylguanidino)tren end-on CuII superoxide.12
Despite its robust nature, 2 is not inert. Heating a benzene solution of the in situ generated 2 at 60 °C results in full consumption of the dioxygen adduct, giving rise to a 1H NMR spectrum with no well-defined features (Scheme 1). Notably, no ligand hydroxylation was observed. Unfortunately, structural confirmation of the final Cu complex (3) has been unsuccessful. A frozen toluene EPR spectrum of 3 collected at 77 K identifies an S = 1/2 signal consistent with a CuII formulation (gCu = 2.24, ACu = 543 MHz, Fig. S14, ESI†). O–O bond cleavage and decay of 2 into a copper hydroxide is possible, likely forming [(ArL)Cu(OH)]n units, as a three-coordinate, terminal copper hydroxide would be unstable.37 A tri-copper formulation would be more plausible than a dimeric motif given the cupric EPR signature of 3. Interestingly, the same product was detected upon treatment of 1 with excess urea hydroperoxide at 65 °C (Scheme 1 and Fig. S15, ESI†), suggesting that a Cu hydroperoxide species may form during the thermal decomposition of 2. Such an intermediate would arise upon a HAA step, transformation which has been previously described for terminal CuII superoxide complexes,12,14–18 albeit not for side-on bound Cu(O2) adducts.23 Indeed, in the presence of a weak hydrogen atom source such as 2-hydroxy-2-azaadamantane 2 rapidly undergoes HAA at room temperature to afford the corresponding N-oxide organic radical as confirmed via EPR spectroscopy (Fig. S17, ESI†). Further, reaction of 2 with 1,4-cyclohexadiene (bond dissociation energy (BDE) = 77 kcal/mol)38 proceeds at 45 °C, generating a CuII species with an EPR signal not well defined, but similar to that of 3 (Scheme 1 and Fig. S18, ESI†), suggesting that HAA from the allylic C–H bond may occur. Following a similar HAA step, exposure of 2 to 2,4-di-tert-butylphenol at 45 °C furnishes the expected C–C coupled dimeric product quantitatively.
Scheme 1.
Reactions leading to formation of complex 3.
Treatment of 2 with either 2,6-di-tert-butylphenol or 2,4,6-tri-tert-butylphenol at 45 °C instead allows for isolation of 2,6-di-tert-butyl-1,4-benzoquinone (identified via GC–MS, major organic product, ESI†) along with detection of the same species 3 by EPR spectroscopy (Scheme 2 and Fig. S20, ESI†). Oxygenation of 2,6- and 2,4,6-substituted phenols to furnish 1,4-benzoquinone derivative products has been demonstrated with several Cu superoxide complexes.12, 15, 16 Recent mechanistic investigations by Karlin et al.16 have proposed that the Cu superoxide is involved in both HAA and subsequent reactivity with the phenoxyl radical to effect the overall four-electron oxygenation. The reactivity of 2 is noteworthy considering that the analogous side-on bound antiferromagnetically coupled CuII superoxide complexes reported display no such chemistry. Complex 2 could potentially rearrange to a terminal O2 binding mode in situ which could then undergo HAA and O-atom transfer as described. Supporting this proposal, reaction of 2 with the radical trap 5,5-dimethyl-1-pyrroline-N-oxide (DMPO) affords a new CuII species (Scheme 3 and Fig. S1, ESI†). That was identified via X-ray crystallography as the (ArL)Cu(O–DMPO) adduct (4) (Fig. S28, ESI†). Although the mechanism of O–O bond cleavage and formation of 4 is unclear at the moment, this result is in line with a superoxide character of the bound O2 moiety in 2.
Scheme 2.
Reactivity of (ArL)Cu(O2) (2).
Scheme 3.
Proposed equilibrium between side-on / end-on O2 bound in 2 and subsequent reaction with DMPO.
Interestingly, despite the electrophilic character inferred from the HAA ability of 2, the Cu/O2 adduct can also engage in acid/base chemistry (Scheme 2). Addition of dioxygen to a benzene solution of 1 and phenol furnishes two new CuII species as indicated by EPR spectroscopy (Fig. S23, ESI†). No C–C coupled product is detected by 1H NMR or GC–MS, suggesting that a phenoxyl radical is not generated during the reaction. Instead, phenol deprotonation and formation of the corresponding (ArL)Cu(OPh) (7) was confirmed via independent synthesis of the phenoxide complex (Figs. S4, S23, ESI†). Treatment of 2 with more acidic phenols such as 4-nitrophenol and 2-amino-4-tert-butylphenol produces a similar outcome, whereas addition of ammonium chloride furnishes the respective (ArL)CuCl (5) (Figs. S2, S24, ESI†). Both Tolman19 and Itoh14 have reported formation of copper phenoxides upon reaction of copper superoxide complexes with para substituted phenols. In these instances, the hypothesized mechanism involves deprotonation of the phenol unit by the superoxide moiety followed by ligand exchange to arrive at a copper phenoxide and the hydroperoxide radical which subsequently disproportionates into hydrogen peroxide and water. Indeed, formation of hydrogen peroxide upon treatment of 2 with phenol was confirmed by iodometry (Fig. S25, ESI†), suggesting that the reaction likely follows an analogous mechanism as previously described.14,19
The switch in the reactivity of 2 towards phenolic substrates reflects a unique property of the dipyrrin Cu/O2 complex relative to other copper dioxygen species. The similar pKa values (in DMSO) for phenol and 4-methoxyphenol or 2,4,6-tri-tert-butylphenol (~17–19)39 suggest that deprotonation over HAA is dictated by the BDE of the O–H bond. As such, 2 undergoes HAA with substrates featuring BDEs38 up to 83 kcal/mol and deprotonates those phenols that necessitate higher oxidative potency for homolytic O–H cleavage, thus demonstrating both electrophilic and basic character. This is not a common feature for other mononuclear copper superoxide complexes in the literature which manifest either reactivity profile, but not both. The end-on CuII superoxide reported by Itoh is the only other example to date of a Cu/O2 adduct engaging in acid/base chemistry with 4-tert-butyphenol and undergoing HAA activity from TEMPO–H (BDE ~ 70kcal/mol),38 albeit access to any stronger O–H or C–H bonds (BDE > 70 kcal/mol) was not demonstrated.14
Complementing the proton and HAA reactivity, 2 also promotes two-electron O-atom transfer chemistry to triphenylphosphine (Scheme 2). Upon addition of dioxygen to a benzene solution of 1 and substrate, regeneration of 1 was accompanied by quantitative formation of triphenylphosphine oxide as confirmed via both 31P NMR and GC–MS. No O-atom transfer was detected when 2 was prepared in the presence of dimethylsulfide or alkene sources (i.e., styrene, 1,3-cyclohexadiene), most likely due to the high binding affinity of the copper(I) centre for these substrates.
The foregoing results showcase the isolation of a robust dipyrromethene copper dioxygen adduct. Despite the side-on coordination of O2, this complex manifests unique reactivity compared to previously described mononuclear Cu(O2) species: both HAA and acid/base chemistry towards a range of phenolic substrates as well as O-atom transfer to triphenylphosphine. To account for the observed reactivity, we propose an in situ formation of a more reactive terminal superoxide complex may precede O-atom transfer, however, an unprecedented substrate activation at the side-on dioxygen moiety cannot be discounted. Overall, the data highlights the importance of the dipyrrin platform in stabilizing such reactive entities and promoting desirable transformations.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by Harvard, the NIH (GM-115815), and the NSF (1541959) (CNS).
Footnotes
Electronic Supplementary Information (ESI) available: General experimental considerations and procedures, 1H NMR data, EPR, and UV-Vis spectra, solid state molecular structures, computational details, crystallographic CIF files and crystallography data. CCDC 1557369 (1), 1557370 (2), 1557371 (4), 1557372 (5), 1557373 (6), 1557374 (7). See DOI: 10.1039/x0xx00000x
Notes and references
- 1.Himes RA, Karlin KD. Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2009;13:119. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2009.02.025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Karlin KD, Itoh S. Copper-Oxygen Chemistry. John Wiley & Sons; Hoboken, NJ: 2011. [VSports最新版本 - Google Scholar]
- 3.Solomon EI, Sundaram UM, Machonkin TE. Chem Rev. 1996;96:2563. doi: 10.1021/cr950046o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Himes RA, Karlin KD. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106:18908. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0911413106. [DOI (VSports最新版本)] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Que L, Tolman WB. Nature. 2008;455:333. doi: 10.1038/nature07371. ["VSports app下载" DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Wendlandt AE, Suess AM, Stahl SS. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2011;50:11062. doi: 10.1002/anie.201103945. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Hatcher LQ, Karlin KD. J Biol Inorg Chem. 2004;9:669. doi: 10.1007/s00775-004-0578-4. [DOI (V体育平台登录)] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Lewis EA, Tolman WB. Chem Rev. 2004;104:1047. doi: 10.1021/cr020633r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Mirica LM, Ottenwaelder X, Stack TDP. Chem Rev. 2004;104:1013. doi: 10.1021/cr020632z. [DOI (V体育ios版)] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Solomon EI, Ginsbach JW, Heppner DE, Kieber-Emmons MT, Kjaergaard CH, Smeets PJ, Woertink JS. Faraday Discuss. 2011;148:11. doi: 10.1039/c005500j. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Elwell CE, Gagnon NL, Neisen BD, Dhar D, Spaeth AD, Yee GM, Tolman WB. Chem Rev. 2017;117:2059. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00636. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Maiti D, Lee DH, Gaotchenova K, Würtele C, Holthausen MC, Sarjeant AAN, Sundermeyer J, Schindler S, Karlin KD. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2007;47:82. doi: 10.1002/anie.200704389. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Kunishita A, Kubo M, Sugimoto H, Ogura T, Satto K, Takui T, Itoh S. J Am Chem Soc. 2009;131:2788. doi: 10.1021/ja809464e. [V体育ios版 - DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Tano T, Okubo Y, Kunishita A, Kubo M, Sugimoto H, Fujieda N, Ogura T, Itoh S. Inorg Chem. 2013;52:10431. doi: 10.1021/ic401261z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Maiti D, Fry C, Woertink JS, Vance MA, Solomon EI, Karlin KD. J Am Chem Soc. 2007;129:264. doi: 10.1021/ja067411l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Lee JY, Peterson RL, Ohkubo K, Garcia-Bosch I, Himes RA, Woertink JS, Moore CD, Solomon EI, Fukuzumi S, Karlin KD. J Am Chem Soc. 2014;136:9925. doi: 10.1021/ja503105b. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Kim S, Lee JY, Cowley RE, Ginsbach JW, Siegler MA, Solomon EI, Karlin KD. J Am Chem Soc. 2015;137:2796. doi: 10.1021/ja511504n. [V体育官网 - DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Peterson RL, Himes RA, Kotani H, Suenobu T, Tian L, Siegler MA, Solomon EI, Fukuzumi S, Karlin KD. J Am Chem Soc. 2011;133:1702. doi: 10.1021/ja110466q. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Donoghue PJ, Gupta AK, Boyce DW, Cramer CJ, Tolman WB. J Am Chem Soc. 2010;132:15869. doi: 10.1021/ja106244k. ["VSports" DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Würtele C, Gaoutchenova E, Harms K, Holthausen MC, Sundermeyer J, Schindler S. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2006;45:3867. doi: 10.1002/anie.200600351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Harata M, Jitsukawa K, Masuda H, Einaga H. J Am Chem Soc. 1994;116:10817. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Fujisawa K, Yoshihiko M, Kitajima N. J Am Chem Soc. 1994;116:12079. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Cramer CJ, Tolman WB. Acc Chem Res. 2007;40:601. doi: 10.1021/ar700008c. [DOI (V体育官网)] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Aboelella NW, Lewis EA, Reynolds AM, Brennessel WW, Cramer CJ, Tolman WB. J Am Chem Soc. 2002;124:10660. doi: 10.1021/ja027164v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Aboelella NW, Kryatov SV, Gherman BF, Brennessel WW, Young VG, Jr, Sarangi R, Rybak-Akimova EV, Hodgson KO, Hedman B, Solomon EI, Cramer CJ, Tolman WB. J Am Chem Soc. 2004;126:16896. doi: 10.1021/ja045678j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Spencer DJE, Aboelella NW, Reynolds AM, Holland PL, Tolman WB. J Am Chem Soc. 2002;124:2108. doi: 10.1021/ja017820b. ["V体育2025版" DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Reynolds AM, Gherman BF, Cramer CJ, Tolman WB. Inorg Chem. 2005;44:6989. doi: 10.1021/ic050280p. ["V体育官网" DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.King ER, Hennessy ET, Betley TA. J Am Chem Soc. 2011;133:4917. doi: 10.1021/ja110066j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Iovan DA, Betley TA. J Am Chem Soc. 2016;138:1983. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5b12582. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Vaska L. Acc Chem Res. 1976;9:175. [Google Scholar]
- 31.Valentine JS. Chem Rev. 1973;73:235. [Google Scholar]
- 32.Gubelmann MH, Williams AF. Struct Bonding (Berlin, Ger) 1983;55:1. [Google Scholar]
- 33.Hill HAO, Tew DG. Comprehensive Coordination Chemistry. Pergamon; Oxford: 1987. [Google Scholar]
- 34.Cramer CJ, Tolman WB, Theopold KH, Rheingold AL. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100:3635. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0535926100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Tomson NC, Williams KD, Dai X, Sproules S, DeBeer S, Warren TH, Wieghardt K. Chem Sci. 2015;6:2474. doi: 10.1039/c4sc03294b. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Neese F. WIREs Comput Mol Sci. 2012;2:73. ["VSports app下载" Google Scholar]
- 37.Dai X, Warren TH. Chem Commun. 2001;1998 doi: 10.1039/b105244f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Luo Y-R. Handbook of Bond Dissociation Energies in Organic Compounds. CRC Press LLC; Boca Raton, FL: 2003. [Google Scholar]
- 39.Warren JJ, Tronic TA, Mayer JM. Chem Rev. 2010;110:6961. doi: 10.1021/cr100085k. ["V体育官网" DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.




