Skip to main page content (V体育平台登录)
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The . gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in . gov or . mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site VSports app下载. .

Https

The site is secure V体育官网. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely. .

. 2023 Aug 22;18(1):613.
doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-04104-w.

One-stage rotator cuff repair in stiff shoulders shows comparable range of motion, clinical outcome and retear rates to non-stiff shoulders: a systematic review

Affiliations

One-stage rotator cuff repair in stiff shoulders shows comparable range of motion, clinical outcome and retear rates to non-stiff shoulders: a systematic review

V体育ios版 - Lei Yao et al. J Orthop Surg Res. .

V体育平台登录 - Abstract

Background: One-stage treatment involving rotator cuff repair and shoulder capsule release is mainly used to treat patients with rotator cuff tears (RCTs) and concomitant shoulder stiffness VSports手机版. Despite the increasing attention to the efficacy and safety of one-stage treatment, controversy still remains. Therefore, this systematic review aims to summarize the indications, operation procedure and rehabilitation protocol, and compare the range of motions (ROMs), functional outcomes and retear rates of one-stage treatment for RCTs in stiff shoulders and non-stiff shoulders. .

Methods: Multiple databases (PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Embase and MEDLINE) were searched for studies that investigated outcomes after one-stage treatment for RCTs concomitant with shoulder stiffness compared with rotator cuff repair for RCTs alone, according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses criteria. Descriptive statistics, including range of motion, patient-reported outcome and retear rate, are presented without meta-analysis due to the heterogeneity and low levels of evidence V体育安卓版. .

Results: A total of 9 cohort studies were included, with 305 patients treated with one-stage treatment involving rotator cuff repair and simultaneous shoulder capsular release and 1059 patients treated with rotator cuff repair alone. Patients in both groups had significant symptom improvement and functional recovery after the one-stage treatment for the stiffness group and standard repair for the non-stiffness group, and most patients could return to normal life and work within 6 months after the operation. The retear rate in the one-stage treatment group was not higher than that in the rotator cuff repair group. No statistically significant differences between the two groups were observed in terms of range of motion and patient-reported outcomes in the vast majority of studies at the final follow-up, including the visual analog scale for pain, the Constant score, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, the University of California Los Angeles Shoulder Score, the Oxford shoulder score and the Simple Shoulder Test V体育ios版. .

Conclusion: One-stage treatment for RCTs in stiff shoulders provides comparable ROM and patient-reported clinical outcomes as rotator cuff repair for non-stiff RCTs. In addition, the rate of postoperative retear in stiff shoulder treated with one-stage treatment was not higher than in non-stiff shoulders VSports最新版本. .

Keywords: Arthroscopic repair; One-stage treatment; Retear; Rotator cuff tear; Stiff shoulder. V体育平台登录.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) study selection flowchart
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Forest plot for retear rates of the stiffness group versus the non-stiffness group. Circles indicate the retear rate, and error bars represent 95% confidence intervals (open circle, non-stiffness group; filled circle, stiffness group)

References

    1. Jeong JY, Shim SB, Hong JH, Im W, Lee SM, Yoo JC. Effect of preoperative frozen shoulder on clinical outcomes after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Orthopaedic J Sports Med. 2020 doi: 10.1177/2325967120934449. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Itoi E, Arce G, Bain GI, Diercks RL, Guttmann D, Imhoff AB, Mazzocca AD, Sugaya H, Yoo YS. Shoulder stiffness: current concepts and concerns. Arthrosc J Arthrosc Related Surg. 2016;32:1402–1414. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2016.03.024. - "V体育官网" DOI - PubMed
    1. Grant JA, Schroeder N, Miller BS, Carpenter JE. Comparison of manipulation and arthroscopic capsular release for adhesive capsulitis: a systematic review. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013;22:1135–1145. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2013.01.010. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Smith CD, Hamer P, Bunker TD. Arthroscopic capsular release for idiopathic frozen shoulder with intra-articular injection and a controlled manipulation. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2014;96:55–60. doi: 10.1308/003588414X13824511650452. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cho NS, Rhee YG. The factors affecting the clinical outcome and integrity of arthroscopically repaired rotator cuff tears of the shoulder. Clin Orthop Surg. 2009;1:96–104. doi: 10.4055/cios.2009.1.2.96. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types