V体育安卓版 - Why did NMDA receptor antagonists fail clinical trials for stroke and traumatic brain injury?
- PMID: 12849400
- DOI: 10.1016/s1474-4422(02)00164-3
Why did NMDA receptor antagonists fail clinical trials for stroke and traumatic brain injury?
Abstract
Glutamate N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists (competitive receptor antagonists, ion channel blockers, and glycine antagonists)--such as selfotel, aptiganel, eliprodil, licostinel and gavestinel--failed to show efficacy in clinical trials of stroke or traumatic brain injury. This failure has been attributed to the deficient properties of the molecules that entered human trials and to inappropriate design of clinical studies. In this article we hypothesise that glutamate may be involved in the acute neurodestructive phase that occurs immediately after traumatic or ischaemic injury (excitotoxicity), but that, after this period, it assumes its normal physiological functions, which include promotion of neuronal survival. We propose that NMDA receptor antagonists failed stroke and traumatic brain injury trials in human beings because blockade of synaptic transmission mediated by NMDA receptors hinders neuronal survival VSports手机版. .
Comment in
-
Is it time to conclude that NMDA antagonists have failed?Lancet Neurol. 2003 Jan;2(1):13; discussion 13. doi: 10.1016/s1474-4422(03)00260-6. Lancet Neurol. 2003. PMID: 12849294 No abstract available.
Publication types (V体育ios版)
- V体育2025版 - Actions
- "V体育平台登录" Actions
MeSH terms
- "V体育官网入口" Actions
- V体育2025版 - Actions
- VSports最新版本 - Actions
- Actions (V体育平台登录)
- Actions (V体育平台登录)
- "V体育官网" Actions
- VSports - Actions
Substances
- VSports app下载 - Actions
- Actions (VSports)
"VSports在线直播" LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical (VSports手机版)
